<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Roko.ca</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roko.ca/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roko.ca</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:46:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on H-Bridge Fundamentals by Roko</title>
		<link>http://roko.ca/robotics/h-bridge-fundamentals/comment-page-2#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator>Roko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roko.ca/?p=44#comment-607</guid>
		<description>Hi RobotJay,

You&#039;re correct on both counts. The intent of the circuit in Figure 3.2 is to simplify the control slightly by reducing the number of required control lines, and allowing for a single PWM line. Nothing is preventing shoot-through if A and B are enabled at the same time, so care still needs to be taken when using that circuit.

A long time ago, when it was harder to source microcontrollers with a high pin-count in the hobby world, controlling motors with as few pins as possible was important to save the few pins available for other important uses, however ultimately this reduced the functionality and flexibility of controlling motors. 

Nowadays, it&#039;s easier to get larger microcontrollers with enough pins that such a circuit is not required. To be honest, on most of my H-bridges nowadays, I control each MOSFET individually, with it&#039;s own pin from the microcontroller. This allows me to be much more creative in firmware with how I control the H-bridge, allowing for more advanced control than would be possible with the circuit in Figure 3-2. 

Hopefully that makes sense, it&#039;s been a long day at work and my brain is shutting down. :)

Cheers,
Roko</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi RobotJay,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re correct on both counts. The intent of the circuit in Figure 3.2 is to simplify the control slightly by reducing the number of required control lines, and allowing for a single PWM line. Nothing is preventing shoot-through if A and B are enabled at the same time, so care still needs to be taken when using that circuit.</p>
<p>A long time ago, when it was harder to source microcontrollers with a high pin-count in the hobby world, controlling motors with as few pins as possible was important to save the few pins available for other important uses, however ultimately this reduced the functionality and flexibility of controlling motors. </p>
<p>Nowadays, it&#8217;s easier to get larger microcontrollers with enough pins that such a circuit is not required. To be honest, on most of my H-bridges nowadays, I control each MOSFET individually, with it&#8217;s own pin from the microcontroller. This allows me to be much more creative in firmware with how I control the H-bridge, allowing for more advanced control than would be possible with the circuit in Figure 3-2. </p>
<p>Hopefully that makes sense, it&#8217;s been a long day at work and my brain is shutting down. <img src='http://roko.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Roko</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on H-Bridge Fundamentals by RobotJay</title>
		<link>http://roko.ca/robotics/h-bridge-fundamentals/comment-page-1#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>RobotJay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roko.ca/?p=44#comment-606</guid>
		<description>Ahhhhh... nevermind.  I see now. P-Mosfets are &quot;ON&quot; when ground is applied.  And although Q1 and Q3 will always be logic high at the same time, Q1 and Q3 will always be opposite of each other.  Sorry for bugging you.  Again, great article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhhhh&#8230; nevermind.  I see now. P-Mosfets are &#8220;ON&#8221; when ground is applied.  And although Q1 and Q3 will always be logic high at the same time, Q1 and Q3 will always be opposite of each other.  Sorry for bugging you.  Again, great article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on H-Bridge Fundamentals by RobotJay</title>
		<link>http://roko.ca/robotics/h-bridge-fundamentals/comment-page-1#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>RobotJay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roko.ca/?p=44#comment-605</guid>
		<description>Similarly, when A and B are on together, what prevents shoot through then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Similarly, when A and B are on together, what prevents shoot through then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on H-Bridge Fundamentals by RobotJay</title>
		<link>http://roko.ca/robotics/h-bridge-fundamentals/comment-page-1#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator>RobotJay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roko.ca/?p=44#comment-604</guid>
		<description>Maybe I&#039;m just dumb, but according to Figure 3.2, won&#039;t Q1 and Q3 ALWAYS be on together?  Won&#039;t Q2 and Q4 also do the same?  Thanks for clarifying for me.  Great article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m just dumb, but according to Figure 3.2, won&#8217;t Q1 and Q3 ALWAYS be on together?  Won&#8217;t Q2 and Q4 also do the same?  Thanks for clarifying for me.  Great article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Assembly of all Four Legs by Enrique &#124; Water Jet Cutting</title>
		<link>http://roko.ca/robotics/quadruped-robotics/first-four-leg/comment-page-1#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrique &#124; Water Jet Cutting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 01:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roko.ca/?p=126#comment-589</guid>
		<description>Too neat! You are truly a leader and a scholar! Wish i had the brains to build up a project like that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too neat! You are truly a leader and a scholar! Wish i had the brains to build up a project like that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Dive Blog! by Alex</title>
		<link>http://roko.ca/diving/new-dive-blog/comment-page-1#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 10:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roko.ca/?p=249#comment-583</guid>
		<description>I was wondering how you&#039;ve become so quiet as of late. Now I know where you have been LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering how you&#8217;ve become so quiet as of late. Now I know where you have been LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mini Sumo PCBs&#8230; by Regina Jones</title>
		<link>http://roko.ca/robotics/mini-sumo-pcbs/comment-page-1#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Regina Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 16:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roko.ca/?p=177#comment-566</guid>
		<description>Wow, designing a PCB sounds like a really complex procedure! I am dreading having to do this during my final year of college. It sucks having a desire to be an engineer!
-Regina from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thebmwclub.co.za/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BMW Specials&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, designing a PCB sounds like a really complex procedure! I am dreading having to do this during my final year of college. It sucks having a desire to be an engineer!<br />
-Regina from <a href="http://www.thebmwclub.co.za/">BMW Specials</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on H-Bridge Fundamentals by motor controller comparison</title>
		<link>http://roko.ca/robotics/h-bridge-fundamentals/comment-page-1#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>motor controller comparison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 02:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roko.ca/?p=44#comment-565</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;which motor you should use...&lt;/strong&gt;

H-Bridge Fundamentals &#171; Roko.ca...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>which motor you should use&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>H-Bridge Fundamentals &laquo; Roko.ca&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on H-Bridge Fundamentals by Lonnie</title>
		<link>http://roko.ca/robotics/h-bridge-fundamentals/comment-page-1#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator>Lonnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roko.ca/?p=44#comment-559</guid>
		<description>I have built several H-bridges and have had a problem finding mosfets that work well in a 3V system. I need a small package, 3 amps peak current, .5 amp run current. Anyone know of good P &amp; N ch devices that fit this application?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have built several H-bridges and have had a problem finding mosfets that work well in a 3V system. I need a small package, 3 amps peak current, .5 amp run current. Anyone know of good P &amp; N ch devices that fit this application?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Boring Head Adventures by kristine911</title>
		<link>http://roko.ca/robotics/quadruped-robotics/boring-head-adventures/comment-page-1#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>kristine911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roko.ca/?p=99#comment-550</guid>
		<description>Now I understand Boring Head  procedure.Thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I understand Boring Head  procedure.Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

